(
Reproduced from Times of India 9th August 2008 pg 1)
Cops
understand only crack of whip: SC
Dhananjay Mahapatra | TNN
New Delhi: Commoners, often harassed
by the polices refusal to register FIRs (first
information reports), have turned the tables on the
men in khaki, thanks to the Supreme Court.
Stating that officials
in India understood only the crack of a
whip, the apex court on Friday ordered
that a policeman turning away a person without
registering his complaint could face contempt of
court charges and cool his heels in jail if he failed
to justify non-registration of the FIR.
Brushing aside the
apprehensions of some counsel who felt that an order
as harsh as this could be prone to misuse by those
who had an axe to grind against the police, the bench
said that in India, officials were activated only by
the crack of a whip.
In India,
officials act only on huntering (flogging). India
understands only chabukthis is the
meaning of swaraj and this is the concept of swaraj
(selfrule), Justice B N Agrawal said.
The cracker of an
order came from a bench headed by Justice Agrawal,
who on Thursday had a massive spat with a former law
minister in open court before recusing himself from
hearing a petition that had sought FIRs against
judicial officers allegedly involved in the Rs 23
crore PF scam.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday
provided a detailed mechanism to the citizens to make
police accountable. The bench comprising Justices
Agrawal and G S Singhvi said if the police refuse to
register an FIR, the aggrieved person can move the
area chief judicial magistrate with a complaint
against the officer concerned.
Posting the order on
the Supreme Court website so that people of
India may know what directions have been given by
this court, the bench said: The
chief judicial magistrate or the chief metropolitan
magistrate, as the case may be, shall take action in
a case of inaction upon filing of a complaint
petition and give direction to institute the case
within a specified time-frame.
If the police fails to act even thereafter, the
CJM or CMM shall not only initiate action against the
delinquent police officer but punish them suitably by
sending them to jail, in case the cause shown is
found to be unsatisfactory.
Moreover, the
concerned CJM or CMM court shall intimate the
disciplinary authority at once by fax as
well about the errant officer, who would
be immediately placed under suspension pending
departmental proceedings. Acting on the petition of
one Lalita Kumari who alleged that her complaint
about her missing minor daughter was not acted upon
by the UP police, the bench had on July 14 said that
it was a common experience across the country that
the police acts pricey in registering complaints from
commoners. In a large number of cases,
investigations do not commence even after
registration of FIRs and in a case like the present
one, steps are not taken for recovery of kidnapped
person or apprehending the accused person with
reasonable despatch, the bench said and
narrated an experience where harsh orders passed by
judicial officers in identical matters had led to his
assault by policemen, who were refused bail.
To prevent such abuse
of police powers, the court had on July 14 said that
it was high time states are directed to make police
register FIRs immediately on receipt of a complaint.
It had sought the response of the chief secretaries
and directors-general of police of states and UTs to
the suggestion that failure to register FIRs would
entail contempt of court action and subsequent jail
term. The failure of states, except Arunachal and UP,
to respond to the July 14 order made the court see
red and it asked the chief secretaries and DGPs to
file their reply in two weeks.
Latest
on this site... This website informs of actions by
Rogue Police in India.