Reproduced from The
Times of India October 31, 2008 pg 17
Now, CIC order
review only in courts
Himanshi Dhawan | TNN
New Delhi: In
a move that smacks of bureaucratic red tapism, the
Central Information Commission (CIC) will no longer
allow review of its decisions. A recent change in the
CIC (Management) Regulations, 2007, now makes it
clear that CICs decision can only be reviewed
through a writ filed in the high court and Supreme
Court.
According to chief
information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, the
rules were not in consonance with law. We
have changed the rules as under law a court cannot
review its own decisions. The CIC does not have the
review power unless there is an error of law or
facts. Habibullah said that applicants
had misunderstood the rules and so a correction had
been made. Information commissioners admit privately
that the number of review applications had begun to
rise and this was becoming difficult to handle.
The rule had
earlier said that an appellant can make an
application to the chief information
commissioner for special leave to appeal or
review of a decision or order of the case and
mention the grounds for such a request. It
was left on the discretion of the CIC to
consider and decide the matter as
he thinks fit. The decision has
now been restricted to rea
A decision or an order once
pronounced by the Commission shall be
final.
RTI activists, on the
other hand, have cried foul over the changes. Col
Lokesh Batra said, Now a complainant can
no longer ask for special leave to review a
decision. Said Subhash Chandra Agarwal
who has filed two review petitions that the decision
will impact RTI. In my application
regarding information on Padma awardees, I had asked
how it was possible for a jury spread across India to
shortlist 100 names from the thousands in just one or
two meetings. I had five queries but only one was
answered, he said.
Agarwal
said that there should be a provision
within the rules for a review by a larger
bench. This will cut down on
litigation costs and also bring about a
consistency in the performance of
information commissioners, he
added.
HC Dismisses Argument That Judge Didnt
Apply Mind During Court Martial
Dhananjay Mahapatra & Abhinav Garg | TNN
New Delhi: Even in the face of
overwhelming evidence against the accused, can a
judge be said to have done complete justice if he was
found to be sending SMSs during the hearing of
arguments in the case?
This question
came up before the Delhi high court as a
naval officer questioned his conviction in a
corruption case. In the face of voluminous
evidence against him, the officer raised
several grounds before Justice Sanjay Kishan
Kaul to allege that the trial was vitiated.
One of the allegations was that the president
of the court martial had not applied his mind
judiciously to his case as it was found that
during the hearing he had used his mobile
phone extensively to send SMSes, though
unrelated to the case, to others. After
weighing the evidence, which was squarely and
conclusively against the officer, Justice
Kaul brushed aside all objections raised
against the court martial proceedings, upheld
his conviction and dismissed his appeal.
However, the question
remained and would continue to haunt the judiciary
and quasi-judicial bodies can a judge during a
hearing use his mobile phone and keep sending SMSes
without it affecting his ability to grasp the
arguments? Counsel Meet Malhotra, appearing for the
court martial convicted M P Verma, produced before
the HC voluminous records from MTNL showing the large
number of SMSes sent by the president of the court
martial proceedings.
He then asked the
question: Can the president of the court
martial be said to have applied his mind to the case
if throughout the proceedings he was sending SMSs to
such a large extent? Does this not exhibit that he
gave no attention to the trial?
Convinced
about the guilt of the accused, Justice
Kaul was not to be distracted by the SMSs
sent by the president of the court
martial. He said: The allegation
that the president of the court martial
had not applied his mind while holding
the trial has not been
substantiated.
Merely because
some SMSes were sent by the president on a particular
day or two would not reflect the nonapplication of
mind by the president of the court martial, more so
when the accused was duly represented by defence
counsel who has cross-examined each and every witness
throughout the trial and has made all objections
whatever available to him while recording of the
evidence of those witnesses, Justice Kaul said.
(
Judges consider themselves as superhumans, capable of
concentrating on matters, whether while sending SMSs
or sleeping ... They believe ordinary humans have no
right to doubt their abilities. All this is, because
people bow and grovel before them, and repeatedly
call them "My Lord" ... IKC )
Warrant
Industry...How the Magistrate / Police
partnership flourishes.