We are
still running our police system with ancient British
era legislation
Thirty-eight kids on a burning bus. Imagine the great
tragedy! The only reason these kids did not perish is
thanks to a quick-thinking, off-duty cop. An off-duty
cop? Whats that? The way their superiors treat
them, there is no such thing as an off-duty cop. Many
constables and lesser-ranked traffic cops routinely
put in 19 hours daily. If its not their regular
beat, it could be guarding some VIPs or being
orderlies to the top cops. They could be attendants,
chauffeurs or even cooks. And in the days of the
Ganesh festival, Ramazan, Dandiya, they probably dont
get 40 winks for weeks together.
The fact is that under the current dispensation,
police officers are working under the whimsical
supervision of political patrons. This dispensation
which puts the police directly under the control of
the political executive the state government
is how the Brits designed it in 1861. Yes, the
police system works according to an act passed by the
British, basically to
rule the unruly natives after the 1857 mutiny. To
this day, most states in India abide by that law.
(Maharashtra passed a modified law the Bombay
State Reserve Police Act in 1951 which mostly
resembles the British Act.)
Under the
current dispensation, police officers
are working
under the whimsical supervision of
political patrons
So, essentially, the
political bosses control the top police boss
the Director General of Police (DGP)
of the state. The DGP can be transferred or
removed without any reason. Would it be
surprising to find that police officers are
compelled to do their masters bidding?
Is it surprising that they have lost most of
their autonomy? Is it surprising that there
is political interference even in
investigative work?
Political opponents can face trumped-up
charges, which become negotiable instruments.
The perfectly legitimate democratic dissent
and protest (think Gadhijis salt march)
can be snuffed on behest of those in
political power. You cannot even hold a
public meeting if the police is instructed
not to issue a no-objection permit. Crime
statistics can be manipulated for political
expediency, by the mere act of registering or
denying FIRs.
The biggest brahmastra is that
of transfers and postings. An officer who is not
pliant enough can be sent on a punishment posting to
Gadhchiroli. It is no wonder that on the eve of
elections, the Election Commission moves police
officers around, to ensure that those beholden to
incumbent power do no subvert the elections. (In
fact, even bureaucrats are shunted around to ensure a
fair poll. But thats another story for another
article!
None of this is new.
Back in 1977, just after the nightmare of
Emergency, the Central Government appointed a
National Police Commission to comprehensively
review the role, responsibilities, power and
duties of the police, and also suggest
appropriate reform. After thoroughly
examining all issues in great depth, the
commission submitted its final report in
1981. To this day, that report is mostly
eating dust. It took a Public Interest
Litigation filed by super cops in the Supreme
Court, which gave new life to police reforms.
Late in 2006, the apex court ruled that
reforms must be implemented, and political
interference removed. For example the DGP
must have a tenure of at least two years; all
transfers and postings are to be done by a
Police Board; investigation must be seperated
from law and order; there must be more
transparency in recruitment (the national
vacancy rate for police is a staggering 2.5
lakh); and so on.
Ajit Ranade
But life hasnt changed
much for the police. 26/11 came and went, but we
havent brought any reforms. If we still have
great officers like Tukaram Ombale it is because of
sheer human dedication, not a healthy police system.
Unless we act fast, we may not be lucky to have
another off-duty cop averting a greater tragedy. Lets
make police reforms an election issue in the upcoming
Maharashtra polls.
(Reproduced
from Mumbai Mirror of August 22, pg 24 Article by
Ajit Ranade)